The Cost Of Living And The Cost Of Staying Alive: Climate Action Is All About Climate Justice


 

On August 16, 2023 Yellowknife faced the likelihood of evacuation from wildfires.
 
On the same day Pierre Poilievre was in PEI making a speech against the carbon tax which he has done for quite some time.
 
Yet only 11 months earlier 95% of PEI was without power from hurricane Fiona.

As of Aug 9 Poilievre is gaining popularity in the polls (ahead of the governing Liberals by 10%).
 
His strategy is to appeal to people’s concern about the rising cost of living.

But what about the cost of staying alive in the face of climate catastrophe? 

Poilievre’s strategy is to make people think that they shouldn’t be the ones bearing “the burden” of doing climate action…despite the fact that the carbon tax offers rebates to most Canadians. (See 19:48 at this link)
 
Because of this situation, climate action is all about climate justice.

If that is true then which party is most likely to deliver?

Many times the Liberals have refused the federal NDP request for a wealth tax.

But the federal NDP is not as aware as the Greens are of the reality of climate change: MP Heather McPherson in Edmonton is a federal NDP who supports the TMX pipeline and continues to get her candidacy papers signed by the leader in spite of that position.
 
The federal Greens are the only party with seats in the House of Commons that comes anywhere near seeing the importance of both climate action and climate justice.

But even the Greens have had a 2019 slogan saying, “not left, not right, but forward.” They have moved away from that slogan recently, but it has been too recently to fit the climate clock we’re in.

Sobering Conclusion

It’s clear to me, looking at the success of Poilievre’s message against the carbon tax on the same day that the capital of NWT faced evacuation that we are in a deep multi-faceted crisis of a lack of public awareness and political wisdom. 

Those are some of the real roots of the worsening climate crisis and it is many times more sobering than hurricanes and fires.

Those of us who are working to improve this situation are clearly facing an uphill battle for life itself.

But even if harm elimination seems unlikely, harm reduction is the right thing to do.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Choosing Nuclear Power is Needlessly Putting More Tools of Death Into Our Future

Choosing Nuclear Power is Needlessly Putting More Tools of Death Into Our Future: Two existential crises and the obvious alternative “Atomic Accomplice: How Canada deals in deadly deceit” a book written by Paul McKay in 2009 has a foreword by David Suzuki. One chapter is called, “Plutonim, the immortal outlaw.” (p 129) The word “immortal” refers to the fact that plutonium remains lethal for 250,000 years. McKay writes, “As a matter of physics, plutonium is created in every nuclear reactor of every make, model, size, purpose, or country of origin or operation…It takes a mere 8 kilograms to make a Nagasaki-scale bomb….” He continues, “Each year the odds grow worse that some of this accumulating, effectively immortal plutonium will be diverted by pariah states, or sold covertly for cash, or stolen for a bomb or nuclear blackmail. In 2009, the International Atomic Energy Agency disclosed that its data base includes 1,646 reports of trafficking, theft or loss of nuclear materials
Read more

Is COVID-19 more important than the climate emergency?

COVID-19 could possibly kill between 1% and 5% of those diagnosed if unstopped, but climate change will certainly kill 100% of humanity if unstopped. Why then did all federal parties pass an emergency motion on March 13 , which says, among other things, that C-4, the bill to implement the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement on trade (CUSMA), or NAFTA 2.0, was deemed to be passed at third reading -- when that agreement doesn’t even mention the climate crisis -- a crisis which literally threatens our continued existence? Sources: News of motion passed: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/parliament-suspended-1.5496469 New NAFTA is Failing on the Climate Emergency: https://behindthenumbers.ca/2020/02/19/whats-next-for-the-new-nafta-and-what-if-anything-can-canadians-do-about-it-now/
Read more

The Cancer of Voter Inequality is part of a Fatal Mix

Image
        Fair Vote Canada links to research showing that countries with an electoral system based on proportional representation act faster on climate change, score higher on Yale’s Environmental Performance Index, and have made 117% greater use of renewable sources of energy. The climate crisis is now the most frightening symptom of the ongoing massive political crisis that gave rise to it and that underpins it at its root. One of the main sources of that “root rot” in Canada, both federally and provincially, is an electoral system based on false majorities and voter inequality. For many decades our deception-riddled electoral system has been undermining our attempts to hold elections that try to uphold even the most basic of democratic principles: the principle of “majority rules.”  For far too long we have mislead ourselves by using the phrase, “majority government” to refer to a government that has won a majority of seats instead of a majority of votes from actual people. Every
Read more