How wind power enters the Just Transition debate in Newfoundland and New Jersey

 

“The day before [the Bay du Nord project was approved], the federal and Newfoundland and Labrador governments took the word "petroleum" out of the name of the regulatory body that has been overseeing the offshore oil industry since 1986. Once the legal niceties are done, the soon-to-be-former C-NLOPB will be known as the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Energy Board, or the C-NLOEB.”

Notice that the federal govt was involved in this name change.

I dug a little deeper into this odd coincidence. I found this article from Apr 5:

“N.L. government lifts 15-year ban on onshore wind farms” https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/nl-wind-moratorium-lifts-1.6409296

Also, on Dec 18, 2012, in order to ensure the economic viability of the Muskrat Falls Hydro Electric Dam, the province enacted legislation prohibiting any other electricity producers on Nfld. This de fact prohibited wind energy. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/researcher-calls-for-changes-for-wind-power-1.3926183

“In 2016, researcher Nick Mercer released a paper that looked at the barriers to the development of wind energy in Newfoundland and Labrador. He outlined several reasons the province was behind the country in wind energy development, the top of which were government legislation and political will….

…At the time, he said if the province was turned into a giant wind farm, it could produce 117 times the amount of electricity it consumes.”

That anti-wind law was lifted only 2 days before the Bay du Nord oil megaproject was approved in early April 2022.

See CBC article, “'Lipstick being put on a pig': Wind power researcher suspicious of government's motives for lifting ban.”

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/wind-power-nick-mercer-1.6411972

Here is a quote from that article:

'This can be a job creator'

Retired provincial politician Kevin Aylward has been a proponent of wind energy for years. Describing himself as an energy transition developer, Aylward says the lifting of the moratorium on wind development is a necessary and vital step for the industry.

Aylward is a partner with Beothuck Energy, which hopes to build a wind farm on the west coast of Newfoundland. In 2016, it secured Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners as a financial backer.

Aylward said wind development can be a job creator and diversify the rural economy.

"It's capital coming into the province that can create brand new jobs here and also, the existing workforce can be used," he said. "The other thing is that you don't have to sell the power to the grid. The new game-changer part of the market is that you can create hydrogen with wind power."

The US had already announced wind funding a year before Bay du Nord was approved.

On March 30, 2021, over a year before the Canadian federal govt approved the Bay du Nord project, the US announced major funding in wind power in places like New Jersey, which is only 2,000 km south of Nfld. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/30/the-us-announces-plans-to-ramp-up-offshore-wind-capacity-in-a-big-way.html

So where was Canada?

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Choosing Nuclear Power is Needlessly Putting More Tools of Death Into Our Future

Choosing Nuclear Power is Needlessly Putting More Tools of Death Into Our Future: Two existential crises and the obvious alternative “Atomic Accomplice: How Canada deals in deadly deceit” a book written by Paul McKay in 2009 has a foreword by David Suzuki. One chapter is called, “Plutonim, the immortal outlaw.” (p 129) The word “immortal” refers to the fact that plutonium remains lethal for 250,000 years. McKay writes, “As a matter of physics, plutonium is created in every nuclear reactor of every make, model, size, purpose, or country of origin or operation…It takes a mere 8 kilograms to make a Nagasaki-scale bomb….” He continues, “Each year the odds grow worse that some of this accumulating, effectively immortal plutonium will be diverted by pariah states, or sold covertly for cash, or stolen for a bomb or nuclear blackmail. In 2009, the International Atomic Energy Agency disclosed that its data base includes 1,646 reports of trafficking, theft or loss of nuclear materials
Read more

Is COVID-19 more important than the climate emergency?

COVID-19 could possibly kill between 1% and 5% of those diagnosed if unstopped, but climate change will certainly kill 100% of humanity if unstopped. Why then did all federal parties pass an emergency motion on March 13 , which says, among other things, that C-4, the bill to implement the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement on trade (CUSMA), or NAFTA 2.0, was deemed to be passed at third reading -- when that agreement doesn’t even mention the climate crisis -- a crisis which literally threatens our continued existence? Sources: News of motion passed: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/parliament-suspended-1.5496469 New NAFTA is Failing on the Climate Emergency: https://behindthenumbers.ca/2020/02/19/whats-next-for-the-new-nafta-and-what-if-anything-can-canadians-do-about-it-now/
Read more

The Cancer of Voter Inequality is part of a Fatal Mix

Image
        Fair Vote Canada links to research showing that countries with an electoral system based on proportional representation act faster on climate change, score higher on Yale’s Environmental Performance Index, and have made 117% greater use of renewable sources of energy. The climate crisis is now the most frightening symptom of the ongoing massive political crisis that gave rise to it and that underpins it at its root. One of the main sources of that “root rot” in Canada, both federally and provincially, is an electoral system based on false majorities and voter inequality. For many decades our deception-riddled electoral system has been undermining our attempts to hold elections that try to uphold even the most basic of democratic principles: the principle of “majority rules.”  For far too long we have mislead ourselves by using the phrase, “majority government” to refer to a government that has won a majority of seats instead of a majority of votes from actual people. Every
Read more